follow/subscribe:

#freekate

Share

Kaitlyn Hunt Refuses Plea Deal: Gay Teen Charged Over Underage Relationship Will Appear In Court (Huffington Post)
ACLU of Florida Statement on Prosecution of 18-Year-Old Kaitlyn Hunt (aclufl.org)

Several years ago, when I was still playing dance games at arcades and going to tournaments and such, I got to know someone who was a registered sex offender here in Ohio. When he was nineteen years old he had a consensual relationship with a woman who was seventeen; the age of consent here in Ohio is eighteen. When the woman’s parents found out, they took him to court over it. Rather than risk a possible ninety-day jail term, he decided to instead take a plea deal where he agreed to register as a sex offender for ten years. He wasn’t predatory in the slightest, and he went on to marry his next girlfriend; I haven’t spoken with either of them for years, but I understand they’re still quite happy together.

This is one of those problems that we Americans don’t tend to talk much about because of the uneasy feeling many people have about discussing sex, a lingering byproduct of the cultural conservatism that’s already done so much harm to our nation (and the world as a whole). As a society we do need to define a “not ready for sex” line, and even though using age is fraught with a number of problems, it’s the best choice out of a number of bad options. When society treats a consensual sexual relationship between two young people only a couple of years apart with the same brutality that it (rightfully) treats sexual predators who prey on the young, though, there is something fundamentally wrong with these laws and how they are applied. Throwing teenagers in prison, or putting them in the same registry with rapists and pedophiles, over consensual sexual relations with other teenagers ruins lives before these young people even get a chance to show all the wonderful things they are capable of. It strains prisons already overcrowded with other non-violent offenders, it destroys families, and it reinforces social conservatives’ attempts to regulate everyone’s sexual activity.

Kaitlyn Hunt is certainly not the first young woman to have been targeted for this kind of treatment, nor is hers the first case where, at least according to Hunt’s mother, the parents of the other girl pressed charges because they thought the older girl “turned their child gay.” It won’t be the last, either. Why Hunt’s case has received this kind of attention while others have not is one of those questions I can’t even begin to answer, but we are here now, and Kaitlyn Hunt is to be commended and lauded for her courage to refuse a plea deal that would have made her a convicted felon confined to her house for two years, even in the face of a possible fifteen-year prison sentence for “lewd and lascivious battery on a child 12 to 16.” Try applying those words to a relationship between two high school classmates, teammates on the school’s women’s basketball team. You can’t. (Don’t even get me started on how this continues conservatives’ tactic of trying to depict all non-heterosexuals as predatory pedophiles.)

Last month there was a news story about a “conversion camp” that promised to “turn” gay teenagers straight in South Africa where three gay teens reportedly died as a result of systematic physical abuse, a story that didn’t get as much attention as it deserved. The “ex-gay” movement is often the target of laughter and derision for a lot of good reasons (among them the fact that the whole “ex-gay” thing is a load of gobbledygook; if you haven’t watched the documentary One Nation Under God yet then you really should), but that laughter all too often masks the struggles that young non-heterosexual and non-cisgender people face at the hands of people who believe this nonsense, especially if those people happen to be their parents. There’s been more talk in recent years about the bullying these young people face in school, but we don’t talk enough about the bullying they could face at home from their parents. Lest we think that the “ex-gay” movement is so far on the fringes of the far-right of this country that we don’t need to give them serious consideration, let’s remember that the husband of Minnesota congresswoman Michele Bachmann, who was at one point the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, runs a clinic that uses so-called “pray away the gay” practices to try to “remove” homosexual feelings from young people.

My own teenage years were marked by revelation and resentment over not just how I was treated as a know-nothing who needed to be “protected” from my own “stupidities,” but how young people in general are treated that way by their parents, by their teachers, and by American society at large. As a teacher of eighteen- and nineteen-year-olds, I am constantly confronted with products of this kind of treatment; I’ve lost count of how many of my students have essentially said to me that I was the first adult in their lives who actually cared about how they felt and what they had to say. It’s one of the most depressing aspects of my job as a teacher, but it’s also one that fuels my passion for teaching and gets me up in the morning, now matter how tired or lousy I feel, because if I don’t provide open ears and an open heart to these young people, then who will?

If you, as a parent, are so intolerant of your own child’s sexual orientation that you would punish your child for something they can’t control, let alone ruin another young person’s life to “get back” because you somehow think that young person “turned” your child gay, then you have pretty much lost all moral rights to make decisions for that child. Our first task, legally, as a result of the Kaitlyn Hunt controversy should be to change our laws so that they differentiate between consensual sexual relations between two young people on the one hand, and truly predatory sexual behaviour on the other. I hope, however, that this case will also draw attention to the problems young non-heterosexual people face at the hands of intolerant parents, and that we can also pass laws to enable those young people trapped in homes with intolerant parents to have a way to escape to a better living situation. All too often in cases like this, the accusing parents can use the threat of kicking their child out of their home to force the child to testify that the sexual activity wasn’t consensual, making the child choose between lying in court or living on the street. Let’s not forget that Kaitlyn Hunt’s young girlfriend, even if she’s not the one facing fifteen years in prison, is also a victim in this case, a victim of her parents’ bullying and prosecutors’ willingness to wield the law like a cudgel to placate these parents, even if they shatter a young girl’s life in the process.

American justice, unlike what the Lady Justice statue depicts, is clearly not blind. It cannot be blind when rich white people just have to check themselves into drug treatment centres when they get caught with drugs, but poor people and minorities face crippling mandatory minimums. It cannot be blind when mega-corporations don’t get laughed out of court for trying to do things like patent genes and trademark centuries-old folk tales. It certainly cannot be blind when a law meant to keep young people safe from sexual predators is used to turn a consensual sexual relationship between two young people into a felony punishable by up to fifteen years in prison.

I’m of the opinion that people (of any age) who engage in sexual activity without serious consideration of its ramifications are usually more than punished enough by the consequences that result from their actions, so I think the charges against Hunt should just be thrown out, rather than dropped to a misdemeanor as many have argued. At the very least, though, I hope fair-minded people can agree that Kaitlyn Hunt having to live with a felony conviction and two years of house arrest, let alone fifteen years in prison, would be so ludicrous that the word “excessive” doesn’t even begin to describe it. I applaud Kaitlyn for her courage to stand up to her girlfriend’s parents, and I can only hope that both she and her girlfriend escape being victimized by not just those parents, but the “justice” system as well.

Exploration Versus Programming

Share

Google Play Music All Access: search giant launches rival to Spotify (guardian.co.uk)

I’ve had three “Internet radio stations” since I launched the .org back in 2000. The first was from a very primitive service that I could never program right; no matter what I did, it just kept churning out classical music all the time, so I hardly ever used it. The second was programmed through Launchcast when it was still a part of Yahoo!, and that worked a lot better for me, even introducing me to some good artists I hadn’t heard before. When Launchcast’s customized radio service was discontinued, I found myself going to last.fm and using my own CD collection (yes, I still buy CDs) to seed my current radio station. Unfortunately this has led to me listening to my own music almost exclusively to create the best blend of music I can for the station, so I hardly ever listen to the station and get its recommendations for other artists I might like.

Since I first set up my last.fm station, though, there’s been a huge rise in streaming music services. I’ve only tinkered with a couple of them, mostly on my tablet when I’m between classes, and none of the ones that let you listen to the song of your choosing when you want to listen to it. When Google updated their music app on my tablet for their new service and offered a free month of their new All Access service, I went ahead and signed up for it because I think I have use for it. In the days since I’ve signed up for All Access, though, I haven’t used it even once, mainly because of a conundrum I find myself facing when it comes to how these services work.

I should explain here that my main purpose in subscribing to a “music library” is to catch up on the past fifteen years or so of popular music. The mid-nineties was the one time in my life when there was a large amount of what I considered good music played in heavy rotation on MTV and the radio, thanks to the rise of grunge and a new wave of folk-rock artists. Eventually, though, the music companies went back to their usual dreck of style-over-substance groups and divas, starting with the Spice Girls and then expanding to include Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera, then the Backstreet Boys and N’Sync. Add in the rise of Limp Bizkit and other similar acts, and it’s no wonder I ducked out of the whole “pop music” thing in the late nineties, getting into the new wave of electronic-based dance music before that also got watered down by corporate music labels. When I went back to college and had lots of homework to do, I found myself listening mostly to the new age albums I’d collected since my pre-teen years (I was a weird kid, I know) for appropriate music to have playing while I taxed my brain, and that’s still primarily what I listen to these days as I read and write and do all that fun stuff.

The thing is, having some knowledge of popular culture is kind of a necessity as a teacher. I’m not one of those teachers who tries to cram unnecessary pop culture references into my classes in an attempt to look cool (I am not, have never been, nor will I ever be “cool”), but when an opportunity presents itself to use something from popular culture to illustrative a point or a concept — like using the Derpy Hooves controversy from My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic to introduce students to the concept of linguistic relativity — students will often retain that information for much longer because I’m tying it in to something that they care about, as opposed to presenting something as a vague academic concept that has no “real life” applications, or at least any applications in their own lives. This is why I’ve wanted a “music library” subscription for a while, so I can catch up on the most popular albums of the past fifteen years — with special focus on what’s topping the charts now — and see if there’s anything from pop music that I can use in my teaching work.

This is where the difficulty comes in, though, because in addition to being a music library, Google Play Music also, like last.fm, creates custom radio stations for you based on your preferences. What this means is that if I start listening to all these pop albums on Google Play Music, Google is probably going to think that that’s the kind of music that I like to listen to, which I’m guessing will not be the case. I feel stuck between choosing either to use my All Access account to access those CDs I need to listen to, and basically give up on the service ever providing accurate recommendations to me, or else using the service to listen only to the kind of music I like listening to and seeing if it provides recommendations of good artists to me.

The whole science of digital recommendations is still imperfect, to say the least; earlier this week Facebook delivered an ad “target to my interests” for tequila, even though one of the listed interests on my Facebook is teetotalism. Still, my old Launchcast station gave me a lot of good recommendations. I think that was due to the fact that Launchcast let you rate not just songs, but artists and albums and genres as well, and do so on a five-star scale, which provided the service with a lot of data to use when it made its recommendations. Google Play Music only lets you give a thumbs up or thumbs down to individual songs, and I find it hard to believe that Google will be able to come up with very accurate recommendations based on such a simplified system.

Ideally, users should be able to “switch off” the recommendation system of any of these services — music, video, or what have you — when they just want to explore media without making a commitment as to how they feel about it. A couple of weeks ago I went to YouTube because I felt like listening to Jesse Ventura’s cover of Barry McGuire’s “Eve of Destruction,” and now my YouTube recommendations are full of professional wrestling videos I have zero interest in, even though I never rated the Ventura video. You can, if you want:

The only solution I see is for me to create a second Google account just for exploration of music through All Access (and YouTube videos as well), but that seems like a whole lot of work to do — especially because I need immediate access to my main Google account on my tablet several times a day — when it would be a lot simpler for Google to just include some switch somewhere that you could turn off when you just want to listen to something, or watch something, without having those listens or views factored into their calculations for their recommendation engine. Is a small switch like that too much to ask for?

Republicans: Do Your ****ing Jobs

Share

Conservative Advice To GOP: Don’t Legislate, Focus On Scandals (NPR.org)

In the autumn of 2010 I decided to stop following politics so closely, in part to focus on my fiction writing, but also because I was getting sick and tired of all the Tea Party nonsense and could see the handwriting on the wall in terms of how the midterm elections would turn out. I still kept half an ear on the news, though, since I needed to know what was going on for my teaching work and other reasons. It was in those pregnant weeks before the midterm elections that the Republican leader in the Senate, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, famously declared that after the Republican landslide that was about to come, “The single most important thing [they] want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.”

Inter-party animosity is hardly something to generate headlines, but it is not, nor should it ever be, the primary guiding force of a politician, let alone a political party. Your primary objective, as an elected official, is to serve the needs of your constituents, whether you believe those needs to be increasing or decreasing the role of government in any particular area. This may ultimately result in other elected officials being voted out of office, but that is always a secondary goal, an effect of the policies you put into place as opposed to a cause. Even if your main goal, deep down, is to get rid of a politician you really despise, you at least put on a veneer that your primary goal is to put your policies into action. McConnell’s naked admission that Republicans were primarily interested in stopping Obama’s reelection efforts should have been a red flag to independent voters that Republicans didn’t deserve their vote, but the anti-Obama furor drummed up by the right, combined with apathy on the left thanks to Obama not acting strongly enough to rescue the working and middle classes from the recession, were too much for Democrats to overcome in 2010.

Republicans playing chicken with the debt ceiling in 2011, and other similar acts of brinkmanship, garnered the most attention after that election, but one of the (many, many) things that hasn’t received as much scrutiny as it deserves is just how little Republicans have actually done since the 2010 midterms. In the first congressional term since those midterms, fewer bills got passed than in any other congress in recorded history, less than a quarter of the number of bills the “Do-Nothing Congress” of the late 1940s. Part of the reason for this is that once Republicans took the house back over they promptly reinstated the ridiculously untaxing schedule that was a hallmark of their previous tenure leading the House, with the House of Representatives only scheduled to work 126 days this year. Worse yet, House Republicans are outright wasting what time they do spend in Washington by repeatedly and pointlessly voting to repeal or defund the Affordable Care Act; this week marked the thirty-seventh time in the past thirty months House Republicans have voted to “kill Obamacare,” even though all these efforts were destined to die in the Senate, let alone overcome an inevitable Obama veto. I understand holding one vote for symbolic purposes and to get congresspeople on the record, but thirty-seven votes in less than two and a half years is nothing short of absurd, a head-smackingly obvious sign of how Republicans are more interested in playing petty games for their base’s amusement than in doing any actual business.

Americans didn’t seem to mind so much in President Clinton’s second term when Republicans went impeachment-crazy over the Monica Lewinsky thing, mostly because the economy was going gangbusters and people were so fascinated with the Internet that they weren’t noticing how much harder they were having to work to maintain their standard of living. We are far, far from those conditions right now. Even as corporate profits and the Dow Jones Industrials and S&P 500 hit record highs, unemployment continues to move at a snail’s pace, and both working-class and middle-class Americans are still suffering the effects of the most recent recession because all that money corporations and their CEOs are making isn’t trickling down (not that it ever did). This is a time when strong government action to bolster the economy is needed, but instead of getting good action, or even bad action, now one of conservative America’s biggest think tanks is literally telling elected Republicans to do even less than they’ve already been doing, to stop doing the work they were elected to do in order to devote their time to fluffing up the aura of scandal surrounding President Obama right now.

To be sure, two very legitimate scandals broke this past week: Revelations that IRS agents illegally targeted conservative groups for special scrutiny, and the US Attorney General’s office admitting to the Associated Press that they secretly subpoenaed the home and work phone records of AP employees in what, at first blush, appears to be a massive overreach of power. Although there’s no serious suggestion that President Obama was personally involved in either of these scandals, they still need to be investigated and resolved thoroughly. (I don’t like how some liberals have tried to smokescreen the IRS scandal by pointing out how ridiculous the tax laws are in allowing political groups to get tax-exempt status; that’s a legitimate point that needs to be addressed soon, but conservatives deserve time to voice their outrage right now.) Unfortunately, these legitimate scandals are getting obscured by the very Republicans who should be the most eager to pursue them because of the false scandals they’ve ginned up for their bloodthirsty base — everything from Benghazi to Umbrella-gate (no, I am not kidding about that last one) — to the degree that trying to keep track of all the ridiculous claims the far-right is making about Obama is now a full-time job.

That’s the thing, because there are already lots of people whose full-time job is pretty much fanning the flames about all bad things, real and perceived, about President Obama and Democrats. From talk radio, to Fox News Channel, to the rapidly-growing beyond-the-fringe efforts like The Blaze and InfoWars — outlets based on such absurd paranoia and conspiracy theories that they give tinfoil hat aficionados a bad name — America already has more than enough people working to discredit Obama and the Democratic Party in the media and push a radical conservative agenda. If more people want to get into that business — and I guess I can’t blame them because clearly there’s a market for it, and people need to make money — then maybe they should go into that as a full-time job.

If you are an elected member of the House of Representatives or the Senate, though, you already have a full-time job, one that you have taken an oath of office to fulfill. It may not get the hoopla of a presidential inauguration, but it is no less important or sincere of an oath. If you no longer want to perform that job because you are more interested in trying to scandalize another elected official than do the people’s business — the business you were elected to do — then you should resign your office and allow someone who will do that job to take your place. Say what you will about Sarah Palin — I certainly have — but at least she had the decency to end her tenure as Governor of Alaska when she decided she’d rather be a right-wing media darling and cultivate her little cult of personality than do a governor’s job. Similarly, the conservative think tank responsible for this “Hey Congressional Republicans, stop passing bills so you can slam Obama all the time” missive is headed by Jim DeMint, who left his job as a Senator from South Carolina months ago in order to lead the think tank.

It’s no great secret that Republicans, starting shortly after the Reagan Revolution, deliberately sabotaged government departments they didn’t like by cutting their funding and appointing people who weren’t interested in handling the duties that those departments are tasked to handle. When Democrats got back in power, Republicans then said that these departments needed to be cut even more (if not eliminated) because “clearly” they weren’t effective (because they were sabotaged), and as Republicans and Democrats have traded power in Washington this cycle has no less than devastated numerous government offices. If Republicans are going to pull what is effectively the same tactic on an entire branch of government, then it may soon become impossible for Congress to do, literally, anything.

It would be bad enough if this were being done in secret, but the fact that conservatives are so publicly and unapologetically considering this demands strong and immediate action just to ensure the ability of our government to function on the most basic of levels. Any elected official, regardless of party, who willfully refuses to perform their job in order to spend more time bolstering a partisan media firestorm should be impeached for dereliction of duty and refusal to perform the duties they swore an oath to perform. If that means impeaching every Republican in the House and the Senate, then so be it. They’re the ones who are so eager to turn everything into a scandal, so let’s see how they like beings the targets of one for a change.

.photography update

Share

New in .photography: Early spring colours and fowl at Olander Park. I hadn’t been to Olander Park since I was little, even though it’s just a little ways north of my house. It isn’t suited too well for the kind of nature photography I like to do, but I still got some good shots of the pale greens of this time of year in this part of Ohio, plus I got close to some really cool ducks.

Screw the “Silly Season”

Share

Benghazi Schools Obama In The Politics Of Scandal (npr.org)

The beginning of May is the start of what’s known as the “silly season” of American politics. Most states have held their primaries, and until we get closer to the election — around September or October — there’s a sense that there won’t be much in the way of “serious” politics done until then. (This isn’t so much the case in presidential election years, thanks to the increased importance of the parties’ annual conventions and vice-presidential announcements and all that hullabaloo.) In addition, fewer people tend to pay attention to the news because they’re out enjoying the nice weather, so many news outlets delve much deeper into the sensational and insubstantive than they normally do in an effort to keep their advertising revenues up through increased viewership/readership. Sometimes the results are laughable — in both good and bad ways — but this year it looks like it will be no laughing matter.

We’re now months into the first round of sequestration cuts, and the stories that at one time were on some people’s radars — devastating cuts to Head Start with some schools literally holding lotteries to determine which kids have to leave, funds for WIC and meals-on-wheels for elderly and infirm people being slashed, furloughs of government employees and kicking homeless people out of shelters and putting them back on the street, among others — have slipped from people’s minds, in part because news outlets stopped talking about them and “news” outlets instead blathered on and on about how cutting White House tours was the Worst Thing Ever. Given that both major political parties just voted overwhelmingly to ease the sequester for air traffic controllers so business travelers wouldn’t face delays, this is a genuine “pox on both of your houses” story with deep human interest roots that touches most of us. Congress voting to ease air travel for the rich but still taking food out of the mouths of poor children and the elderly? Any journalist worth their weight in sweat would be driving across the country right now, collecting and publishing stories of how devastating these cuts are at a time when the economic recovery is still failing to reach the working and middle classes like it is big companies and their executives.

Instead, House Republicans just yelled “Benghazi” en masse this week, and a press corps desperate for juicy scandal to boost their profit margins seems all too eager to go along with them just to get some extra money by fluffing up a far-right conspiracy that has so little substance behind it that any reputable news organization should have dismissed it months ago. As long as our press is governed by profits and not journalism, though, this is the crap we’re going to have to put up with.

I don’t want to get into a full elaboration on why the whole Benghazi controversy is a load of hot air because I’ve done so already, but in short, the errors made during the Benghazi attack and its immediate aftermath have already been investigated and shown to have been accidental, not deliberate in any manner. Secretary of State Clinton and President Obama were both proven to have had no culpability in the matter, but they still took responsibility anyway because that’s what you do when you’re the boss. The only way conservatives’ logic for impeaching President Obama (or effectively disqualifying Hillary Clinton from a 2016 presidential bid) is to begin with what is both their first premise and ultimate conclusion, the same as it’s been for every issue from Cash for Clunkers to Fast and Furious — that President Obama (and Secretary Clinton by extension) “hate America” and are “evil.” Remove that premise — and it’s so absurd that only the blindest of political partisans would even attempt to believe it — and nearly every conservative argument about Benghazi falls to pieces on the elementary question of motive.

Their new tactic is to focus instead on an alleged cover-up after the attack, going back to White House e-mails following the attack that Republicans have literally had their hands on for months, and using some kind of super-secret decoder ring they’ve constructed in the meantime to show how President Obama allegedly tried to conceal the mistakes made in the response to Benghazi. On the plus side, this is one argument where people don’t have to buy into the “Obama is evil/hates America/is a secret Kenyan Muslim America-hating freedom-abolishing socialist atheist whatever” line, because the only claim being made is that Obama tried to hide his mistakes. That reaction is human enough, and one Americans are certainly prone to believe their politicians of doing a lot of the time.

However, when the Republicans rolled out this new line in their congressional hearing this week, there were so many red flags to raise about how it was presented — Democratic committee members not allowed to call witnesses who could have refuted claims Republican witnesses made, and not gaining access to said Republican witnesses — that the hearing shouldn’t have registered as more than a blip anywhere but in the right-wing media bubble. It was pure show trial, Republicans polishing a turd of an argument so well that it provided just enough substance that journalists, tempted by the lure of scandal, have presented it as the political equivalent of a summer blockbuster movie. It’s the hit of the summer! Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in Benghazigate. You don’t even have to buy a twelve-dollar ticket to see it; just tune in to your political show of choice.

We have seen this repeatedly since the earliest days of the Obama Administration. Just like Republicans leaped on every small thing they could find about Bill Clinton when he was president that they could scandalize, until the whole Monica Lewinksy thing finally stuck, they have tried to turn President’ Obama’s every word and action into a possible cause for impeachment. If Democrats had put in even a tenth of the effort Republicans have put in to make Bush 43 pay for the very real scandals of his time in office — not paying enough attention to their own intelligence that said months before 09.11 that al-Qaeda was planning on attacking targets within America, Vice President Cheney and oil company executives rewriting the country’s whole energy policy in secret, lying the country into a war that cost thousands of American lives and trillions of American dollars, outing Valerie Plame as political payback for her husband debunking one of the administration’s lies for that war, Bush pretending to play guitar with John McCain while the New Orleans levies broke, among others — Bush would have been out of office, and probably in prison, long before his second term was up. For every real scandal of a Republican president, conservatives froth at the mouth to create an equivalent scandal for a Democratic president, usually with “evidence” and reasoning that doesn’t pass a basic smell test because they pulled it straight out of their asses and it still stinks like what it is — total and complete crap.

The worst part is that this is coming in the wake of a very real scandal that conservatives have every right to seize on, the IRS admitting that they hassled Tea Party-affiliated groups since the dawn of the Tea Party movement, targeting them for special scrutiny. Tea Party groups have been making this claim for years, and they have now been proven completely right. So far this is looking like the work of unscrupulous low-level employees — the IRS has only two positions that are filled by political means because the IRS is supposed to be apolitical — but this is exactly the kind of thing that should never, ever happen to any group. This demands no less than a special prosecutor to get to the bottom of how this happened, who was responsible, and what safeguards need to be put in place to make sure this never happens again.

Perhaps the IRS story will pick up steam in the days to come, but right now Benghazi continues to dominate the news. Like the old journalism saying goes, “If it bleeds, it leads,” and the lives lost as a result of the Benghazi consulate attack are “sexier” than a tax scandal, much less poor kids going hungry or getting kicked out of Head Start. It is unspeakably shameful that the press has turned a blind eye to the millions of victims of the sequester, those who already had so little going for them before the illogical and tragic butchering of the social safety net at a time when it is needed most, but time and time again the American press has shown that profits trump actual journalism in their eyes. All we need is a semen-stained dress from Benghazi to make the whole wretched spectacle complete.